Copyright Notice

Inno J reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical modifications to maintain the language's worship pattern while respecting the authors' style. Final papers will not be sent to the authors.

Sponsorship Disclosure

Inno J is edited by Rangel Alexander, from Zulia, VE.

Journal History

Inno J, a journal with its inaugural publication in 2023, aims to contribute to the international academic community by presenting unpublished scientific articles on the theme of Sciencie, Inno J is responsible for editing the articles.

Privacy Statement

The content of the articles is the sole responsibility of the authors.

Total or partial reproduction of the content of the articles is allowed, provided the source is mentioned.

Articles with plagiarism will be refused, and the author of the plagiarism will lose the right to publish in this journal.

The names and addresses provided in this journal will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication and are not available for other purposes or to third parties.

Upon submission of articles, authors grant copyright of their articles to Inno J. If an author wishes to retract their submission, they must do so within two months before the release of the issue in which the article is scheduled to be published.

Inno J utilizes the Creative Commons Innoscience Journal © 2023 by Innoj is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0  

Ethics Policy

Publishing Ethics and Publishing Malpractice Statement

Inno J is committed to upholding ethical standards and ensuring the highest quality of published articles. Our commitment extends to all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, journal editors, and reviewers. We do not tolerate plagiarism or other unethical behavior.

All Articles and papers submitted to Inno J undergo double-blind peer review to ensure their scientific quality. Since 2023, we have also been using CrossCheck (CrossRef's plagiarism software) to verify submitted articles for plagiarism before sending them for evaluation.

Furthermore, we are dedicated to ensuring that commercial interests do not influence editorial decisions. Our primary focus is on the quality of the articles we publish.

This declaration is based on the recommendations of Elsevier and the Good Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors of the Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE (COPE Guidelines).

Below, we outline the responsibilities of each party involved in the publication of articles based on these recommendations:

Editor's Duties:

Publication Decision: The journal's editor-in-chief is responsible for deciding which articles to publish based on the recommendations of the Editorial Committee. The editor is also guided by legal requirements that affect defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.

Fair Play: The editor should evaluate articles solely based on their intellectual content, without regard to authors' personal characteristics such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality: The editor and the editorial team must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, or other editorial advisors.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: The editor cannot use unpublished information for their research without the express written consent of the authors. The editor must also decline to evaluate manuscripts with conflicts of interest, whether competitive or collaborative.

Reviewer's Duties

Contribution to Editorial Decision: Double-blind peer review helps the editor make editorial decisions, and suggestions for modifications assist authors in improving their articles.

Promptness: Reviewers should promptly decline to review articles if they believe their expertise or time availability may hinder the review process.

Confidentiality: Reviewers must treat all received articles as strictly confidential and should not discuss them with individuals outside the editorial process.

Objectivity: Reviewers must objectively assess articles and provide feedback based on scientific arguments.

Prior Work: Reviewers should identify relevant published work not covered in the reviewed article. If reviewers notice any significant overlap between the evaluated paper and another already published paper, they should alert the editor and the authors.

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Any information obtained during the review process should be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should also decline to evaluate manuscripts with conflicts of interest, whether competitive or collaborative.

Author's Duties:

Research Reporting Standards: Authors must provide an accurate account of their research, including an objective discussion of their findings. Data must be presented accurately, and fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are considered unethical and unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original and properly cite and quote the work and words of others. Plagiarism in any form is considered unethical and unacceptable.

Multiple Publications: Authors may not submit manuscripts describing the same research to multiple journals or publish the same article in different journals. This practice is considered unethical and unacceptable.

Source Acknowledgment: Authors must cite publications that influenced their work, and information obtained privately must not be used or reported without written permission from the source.

Authorship: Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made significant contributions to the research. The corresponding author must declare that all appropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version.

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest, whether financial or otherwise, that may influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support must be disclosed.

Correction of Errors: If authors discover significant errors in their published work, they must immediately notify the editor and cooperate in retracting or correcting the errors.

Archival System

The content collection of Inno J is preserved using digital preservation tools, specifically through the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) system.